Main.WayForward History
Hide minor edits - Show changes to markup
22 June 2005, at 11:53 AM
by John Rankin -
Changed line 12 from:
- high-end — http://www.fedora.info/ Fedora plus http://arrow.edu.au/ ARROW services layer
to:
- high-end — http://www.fedora.info/ Fedora plus http://arrow.edu.au/ ARROW services layer; the CERN http://cdsware.cern.ch/ Document Server may be a suitable alternative
14 June 2005, at 07:33 PM
by John Rankin -
Changed line 14 from:
- The technical solution is only part of the process; the real challenge is policy and process culture change
to:
- The technical solution is a minor part of the process; the real challenge is policy and process culture change
14 June 2005, at 05:31 PM
by John Rankin -
Changed line 19 from:
- The library is the natural home of research repositories, with strong links to research offices
to:
- The academic library is the natural home of research repositories, with strong links to research offices
Changed line 28 from:
Recommendations: discover research outputs through multiple pathways
to:
Recommendations: enable research discovery through multiple pathways
13 June 2005, at 06:51 PM
by John Rankin -
Changed line 28 from:
Recommendations: find research outputs through multiple pathways
to:
Recommendations: discover research outputs through multiple pathways
13 June 2005, at 06:25 PM
by John Rankin -
Changed line 12 from:
- high-end — http://www.fedora.org/ Fedora plus http://arrow.edu.au/ ARROW services layer
to:
- high-end — http://www.fedora.info/ Fedora plus http://arrow.edu.au/ ARROW services layer
13 June 2005, at 06:22 PM
by John Rankin -
Changed lines 1-38 from:
to:
Institutional research repositories are part of a wider policy and operational framework of repositories, such as learning object repositories and data repositories. They are becoming an essential part of research infrastructure.
tocauto?
Conclusions: libraries are the ultimate repository of knowledge
- Institutional research repositories are viable. They give authors enhanced exposure and enable improved institutional efficiency.
- There are a range of technical options, depending on institutional need
- low cost of entry, but limited functionality — http://www.eprints.org/ ePrints or http://www.umi.com/proquest/digitalcommons/ Digital Commons
- mid-range — http://www.dspace.org/ DSpace, http://arno.uvt.nl/~arno/site/index.html ARNO and others
- high-end — http://www.fedora.org/ Fedora plus http://arrow.edu.au/ ARROW services layer
- The technical solution is only part of the process; the real challenge is policy and process culture change
- mandated or voluntary deposit?
- tie into [PBRF|Performance Based Research Funding] reporting?
- making submission as painless as possible
- The library is the natural home of research repositories, with strong links to research offices
- safe and trusted custodian
- understand archiving and preservation needs
- part of the information infrastructure
- Repositories are most naturally institution-based, with national resource discovery and discipline slices
- open standards enable national and international interoperability
- common metadata schemata enable discovery
Recommendations: find research outputs through multiple pathways
- Develop a business case to government for institutional research repositories as an essential enabler of enriched scholarly communication
- Seek commitment from institutions to fund demonstrator repository projects, and give them support to build their repository capability
- Ask the National Library to develop a national research resource discovery service that harvests from the demonstrator repositories
- Seek opportunities to learn from, collaborate with, and contribute to Australian repository and interoperability initiatives
- Develop strategies to make institutional research repositories a permanent and sustainable part of the national research infrastructure