Tertiary Wiki ~ Institutional Repositories

Institutional Repositories: Main /

Report of Findings

Main.ReportOfFindings History

Hide minor edits - Show changes to markup

27 July 2005, at 02:33 PM by John Rankin -

Changed line 1 from:

The Attach:IR_report.pdf draft report Δ (pdf, 288kBytes) is available for download (appendices may be viewed at Fact Finding). Visitors who wish to may comment at

to:

The Attach:IR_report.pdf final report Δ (pdf, 288kBytes) is available for download (appendices may be viewed at Fact Finding). Visitors who wish to may comment at

Changed lines 5-6 from:

Wednesday, 27 July 2005 incorporate feedback from steering group and add road map
Tuesday, 19 July 2005 incorporate comments from Louise Munro and make final edits

to:

Wednesday, 27 July 2005 incorporate feedback from steering group and add road map; uploaded as final
Tuesday, 19 July 2005 incorporate comments from Louise Munro and make final edits; uploaded as final draft

27 July 2005, at 02:32 PM by John Rankin -

Changed line 1 from:

The Attach:IR_report.pdf draft report Δ (pdf, 280kBytes) is available for download (appendices may be viewed at Fact Finding). Visitors who wish to may comment at

to:

The Attach:IR_report.pdf draft report Δ (pdf, 288kBytes) is available for download (appendices may be viewed at Fact Finding). Visitors who wish to may comment at

Added line 5:

Wednesday, 27 July 2005 incorporate feedback from steering group and add road map

19 July 2005, at 12:00 PM by John Rankin -

Changed line 1 from:

The Attach:IR_report.pdf draft report Δ (pdf, 272kBytes) is available for download (appendices may be viewed at Fact Finding). Visitors who wish to may comment at

to:

The Attach:IR_report.pdf draft report Δ (pdf, 280kBytes) is available for download (appendices may be viewed at Fact Finding). Visitors who wish to may comment at

Added line 5:

Tuesday, 19 July 2005 incorporate comments from Louise Munro and make final edits

15 July 2005, at 12:06 PM by John Rankin -

Changed line 5 from:

Thursday, 14 July 2005 incorporate comments from John Redmayne and Tony Millett

to:

Friday, 15 July 2005 incorporate comments from John Redmayne and Tony Millett

14 July 2005, at 06:56 PM by John Rankin -

Changed lines 5-6 from:

Wednesday, 13 July 2005 incorporate other comments received so far

to:

Thursday, 14 July 2005 incorporate comments from John Redmayne and Tony Millett
Wednesday, 13 July 2005 incorporate comments received from Brian Opie

13 July 2005, at 04:50 PM by John Rankin -

Changed line 1 from:

The Attach:IR_report.pdf draft report Δ (pdf, 264kBytes) is available for download (appendices may be viewed at Fact Finding). Visitors who wish to may comment at

to:

The Attach:IR_report.pdf draft report Δ (pdf, 272kBytes) is available for download (appendices may be viewed at Fact Finding). Visitors who wish to may comment at

Added line 5:

Wednesday, 13 July 2005 incorporate other comments received so far

06 July 2005, at 11:44 AM by John Rankin -

Changed line 8 from:

The following is an outline structure for the Report of Findings.

to:

The following is an outline structure for the Report of Findings. There is a presentation summarising the report starting at Why Repositories Matter.

06 July 2005, at 11:37 AM by John Rankin -

Changed lines 1-2 from:

The Attach:IR_report.pdf draft report Δ (pdf, 264kBytes) is available for download (appendices may be viewed at Fact Finding).

to:

The Attach:IR_report.pdf draft report Δ (pdf, 264kBytes) is available for download (appendices may be viewed at Fact Finding). Visitors who wish to may comment at {{Report-Comments}}.

05 July 2005, at 04:29 PM by John Rankin -

Changed lines 1-7 from:

The Attach:IR_report.pdf draft report Δ (pdf, 264kBytes) is available for download (appendices may be viewed at Fact Finding). The following is an outline structure for the Report of Findings.

to:

The Attach:IR_report.pdf draft report Δ (pdf, 264kBytes) is available for download (appendices may be viewed at Fact Finding).

Report history:

Tuesday, 5 July 2005 incorporate comments from Geoff Payne and Arthur Sale
Friday, 1 July 2005 first exposure draft released

The following is an outline structure for the Report of Findings.

05 July 2005, at 04:03 PM by John Rankin -

Changed line 1 from:

The Attach:IR_report.pdf draft report Δ (pdf, 257kBytes) is available for download (appendices may be viewed at Fact Finding). The following is an outline structure for the Report of Findings.

to:

The Attach:IR_report.pdf draft report Δ (pdf, 264kBytes) is available for download (appendices may be viewed at Fact Finding). The following is an outline structure for the Report of Findings.

01 July 2005, at 09:51 AM by John Rankin -

Changed line 1 from:

The Attach:IR_report.pdf draft report Δ (pdf, 257kBytes) is available for download. The following is an outline structure for the Report of Findings.

to:

The Attach:IR_report.pdf draft report Δ (pdf, 257kBytes) is available for download (appendices may be viewed at Fact Finding). The following is an outline structure for the Report of Findings.

Changed line 5 from:

A framework for New Zealand

to:

A repository framework for New Zealand

Changed lines 9-56 from:

Context
- Part of the Digital Strategy
- Successful overseas models
- Repositories support open access
Outline business case
- Increase research impact
- Preserve digital research outputs
- Harness institutional efficiency
Business satisfaction criteria
- Authors gain visibility
- Information seekers find research more easily
- Institutions raise their research profile
- Funders see wider research dissemination
Programme definition
- Purpose
- Principles
- Scope is
- Scope is not
- Architectural framework
Business issues
- Support the national component
- Create incentives for authors to deposit
- Link to PBRF reporting process
- Build repository management capability
- Copyright must allow open access deposit
Technical solution options
- A range of repository software options
- Needs and priorities determine choice
- Access control over protected works
- Other services
Technical issues
- Choose suitable software
- Adopt relevant global standards
- Systems integration
- Prepare for the future
- Hardware is not an entry issue
Outline project plan
- Start with demonstrator projects
- Set up cross-functional teams
- Create centre(s) of repository expertise
- Beyond 2006: repositories are business as usual

to:

Why institutional repositories matter
- Context
  - Part of the Digital Strategy
  - A global success story
  - Repositories support open access
- Benefits of institutional repositories
  - Increase research impact
  - Preserve digital research outputs
  - Harness institutional efficiency
- Business satisfaction criteria
  - Authors gain visibility
  - Information seekers find research more easily
  - Institutions raise their research profile
  - Funders see wider research dissemination
- Strategic intent
  - Beyond 2007: repositories are business as usual
  - Create centre(s) of repository expertise
Make institutional repositories happen
- Programme definition
  - Purpose
  - Principles
  - Scope aspires to include all research outputs
  - Scope is not
  - Architecture
- Business issues
  - Support a national framework
  - Create incentives for authors to deposit
  - Link to PBRF reporting process
  - Build repository management capability
  - Copyright must allow open access deposit
- Outline project plan
  - Start with demonstrator projects
  - Set up cross-functional teams
Choose suitable repository software
- Technical solution options
  - A range of repository software options
  - Needs and priorities determine choice
  - Access control over protected works
  - Other services
- Technical issues
  - Choose suitable software
  - Adopt relevant global standards
  - Systems integration
  - Prepare for the future
  - Hardware is not an entry issue

29 June 2005, at 04:29 PM by John Rankin -

Changed line 1 from:

The following is a proposed structure for the Report of Findings.

to:

The Attach:IR_report.pdf draft report Δ (pdf, 257kBytes) is available for download. The following is an outline structure for the Report of Findings.

Added line 12:

Repositories support open access

Deleted line 14:

Recognise the open access trend

Deleted line 15:

Improve institutional efficiency

Added line 17:

Harness institutional efficiency

Changed lines 60-63 from:

Support institutional initiatives

to:

Support institutional initiatives

Appendices
- Fact Finding

27 June 2005, at 03:35 PM by John Rankin -

Deleted lines 12-18:

Programme definition
- Purpose
- Principles
- Scope is
- Scope is not
- Architectural framework

Changed lines 23-30 from:

Funders see wider dissemination

to:

Funders see wider research dissemination

Programme definition
- Purpose
- Principles
- Scope is
- Scope is not
- Architectural framework

Added line 33:

Support the national component

Deleted line 37:

Support the national component

Changed lines 41-42 from:

OAI-PMH enables resource discovery
Federated access control over protected works

to:

Needs and priorities determine choice
Access control over protected works

Changed lines 57-60 from:

Recommended actions

to:

Recommended actions
- Establish a national framework
- Support institutional initiatives

16 June 2005, at 05:18 PM by John Rankin -

Changed lines 36-37 from:

Copyright must allow open access publication

to:

Copyright must allow open access deposit
Support the national component

Added line 49:

Prepare for the future

Changed lines 57-58 from:

Recommended actions

to:

Recommended actions

13 June 2005, at 05:31 PM by John Rankin -

Changed line 18 from:

Architecture

to:

Architectural framework

Changed line 21 from:

Join the open access movement

to:

Recognise the open access trend

Changed line 41 from:

Access control over protected works

to:

Federated access control over protected works

Changed line 48 from:

Hardware is not an issue

to:

Hardware is not an entry issue

Changed lines 52-53 from:

Set up cross-functional teams

to:

Set up cross-functional teams
Create centre(s) of repository expertise

12 June 2005, at 04:25 PM by John Rankin -

Changed lines 33-34 from:

Incentives for authors to deposit
Links to PBRF reporting process

to:

Create incentives for authors to deposit
Link to PBRF reporting process

Changed line 46 from:

Adopt global standards

to:

Adopt relevant global standards

09 June 2005, at 09:43 AM by John Rankin -

Changed lines 1-55 from:

Describe Report of Findings here.

to:

The following is a proposed structure for the Report of Findings.

Introduction
- What is an Institutional Repository
- A framework for New Zealand
- Report structure
- Acknowledgements
Context
- Part of the Digital Strategy
- Successful overseas models
Programme definition
- Purpose
- Principles
- Scope is
- Scope is not
- Architecture
Outline business case
- Join the open access movement
- Increase research impact
- Improve institutional efficiency
- Preserve digital research outputs
Business satisfaction criteria
- Authors gain visibility
- Information seekers find research more easily
- Institutions raise their research profile
- Funders see wider dissemination
Business issues
- Incentives for authors to deposit
- Links to PBRF reporting process
- Build repository management capability
- Copyright must allow open access publication
Technical solution options
- A range of repository software options
- OAI-PMH enables resource discovery
- Access control over protected works
- Other services
Technical issues
- Choose suitable software
- Adopt global standards
- Systems integration
- Hardware is not an issue
Outline project plan
- Start with demonstrator projects
- Set up cross-functional teams
- Beyond 2006: repositories are business as usual
Recommended actions

Home Page

Main.SideBar (edit)

Wiki Sandbox

PmWiki

pmwiki.org

ShareAlike Licence

Edit · History · Print · Recent Changes · Search · Links

Page last modified on 26 November 2006, at 06:34 PM